Imagine a compliance platform that costs you $12,000 per year. Are you paying too much?
It all depends on the item you are replacing.
If automating the collection of evidence in a complicated technology system eliminates hundreds of hours of tedious work, then $12,000 could be an appropriate amount to spend. If a seven-person startup could gather the same data by hand in just a few hours each month, the figure looks considerably different.
That’s a useful way to approach the search for a Vanta alternative. Don’t start with asking which platform has the greatest features. Consider what these features can allow your company to save time and money.
Automation Can be a Break-Even Economic Factor
Automating compliance isn’t necessarily good or bad. Scale can alter its value. Imagine a technology company that is growing that has hundreds of employees numerous cloud environments, multiple applications, and frequently access changes. The effort of manually capturing evidence over time could become extremely heavy. Integrations that automatically monitor systems and collect evidence could easily justify the expense.
Imagine a company of 10 people getting ready for its first SOC 2. Its infrastructure might be compact, and the evidence collection may be manageable without extensive automation.
This is an important distinction to consider when evaluating Vanta’s pricing. The capabilities of a high-end platform are impressive, however they can only be of value for organizations that require them.
Compare Architecture and Not Just Brands
Searching for Vanta Vs. Drata can quickly become an exercise in feature-by-feature. Both platforms are built upon automation and are integrated, so organizations looking for this approach can benefit from comparison of the frameworks that are supported by their integrations, as well as the service along with individual quotes and contracts.
There’s a second decision you need to make. Does your business have an interest in an integrated platform that can help you achieve compliance? Certain companies want automated evidence collection and constant monitoring. Certain businesses prefer collecting evidence themselves.
Vanta Competitors don’t all follow the same format.
Several well-known Vanta competitors are in competition with the same focus on automation. There are lighter platforms focused on organization with large system connectivity.
CertAssist is a part of this group. CertAssist is a product developed by compliance consultants, internal auditors and other professionals, is a system for organizing controls frameworks into a single workspace. It lets you edit guidelines and policies for evidence, and allows auditors to review evidence via read-only access.
It is deliberately not connected to operating systems, nor create infrastructure agents. Customers are able to upload the evidence they choose.
Consideration of System Access in the Making
Removing integrations has an obvious disadvantage: one must collect evidence manually.
The compliance software does not require integration and can be utilized without ongoing connections to the operational environment.
Neither architecture is universally superior. It is essential to consider which choices are best to your business.
CertAssist is a solution for teams with between five and 200 members. Its pricing is published instead of requiring a sales call to get the first figure. The initial price is $225 monthly, which is a significant reduction from the standard price of $375 a month.
Let Complexity Have Its Proper Place
Today’s needs for a startup with 10 employees are not necessarily similar to the needs of companies with 100 or 500 workers.
Compliance can be managed with the use of a simple platform. Automation’s cost-effectiveness can grow as systems, staff and frameworks expand. Let complexity be the primary factor when you purchase compliance technology.
Don’t buy fifty integrations merely because they appear attractive in a chart of comparison. You should pay for them only if the cost to do the work by hand is greater.