Let’s say a compliance platform is priced at $12,000 per year. Are you paying too much?
The answer depends on what it replaces.
If technology can eliminate hundreds of hours tedious evidence collection across a complicated technology environment, $12,000 could be a good investment. If a small business of seven people could gather the same evidence manually in a few hours every month, the cost appears to be quite different.
This is a good way to search for Vanta alternatives. Asking which platform has the most advanced features isn’t the first step. Ask what those features will save your company in actual time and energy.
Automation Has an Economic Break-Even Factor
It’s not inherently either good or negative. The scale of the business can affect its value. Imagine a tech company which is expanding, numerous cloud environments, numerous applications and frequent changes to access. Gathering evidence manually can be a major operational burden. Integrations that monitor systems automatically and take evidence are able to justify the cost.
Imagine a startup of 10 people who are preparing to go through its first SOC 2 audit. Its infrastructure might be compact, and evidence collection could remain manageable without the need for extensive automation.
That difference matters when evaluating Vanta pricing. The capabilities of a high-end platform are impressive, however they only provide financial value for organizations that require them.
Compare Architecture and not just Brands
Vanta Vs Drata is a discussion that could easily be a feature-by-feature exercise. It is crucial to evaluate the features, services, contracts and quotes of each platform. Both are reputable systems for compliance that are focused on integrations and automation.
Another decision needs to be made prior to that. Does your business want an integrated compliance platform at all? Certain businesses would prefer automated evidence collection as well as continuous monitoring. Others prefer to present evidence themselves, especially when the workload remains modest.
Vanta Competitors do not follow the same format.
Many well-known Vanta competitors compete within the same automation-oriented category. On the market, there are platforms that have a more minimalist design which are focused more on the organization of systems rather instead of connectivity.
CertAssist is a part of this category. CertAssist was created by compliance consultants, internal auditors and other professionals, organizes the controls frameworks in a central place. It provides editable guidelines and policies to support evidence and allows auditors to look over evidence using read-only access.
It does not install agents or connect to infrastructure systems. Customers can upload their own documents.
Factor System Access to the Decision
The elimination of integrations has its limitations: one must manually gather evidence.
This removes the requirement for integration, and the use of compliance is not dependent on an integration with the operating environment.
The design and architecture of one is not superior to the other. Which one is appropriate for your business?
CertAssist is aimed at teams of between five and 200 people and publishes its pricing rather than requiring the salesperson to discuss the starting figure. The starting price is $225 per month, which compares to the regular price of $375 a month.
Let Complexity earn its place
What a start-up with 10 employees needs today may not be the same when you have 500 or 100 employees.
A lighter platform can be beneficial while compliance stays straightforward. As the number of systems, employees, frameworks and evidence requirements increases, economics may eventually favour deeper automation. Let complexity be the primary factor when it comes to purchasing compliance technology.
Affording fifty integrations because they look great in a comparison table is not a good idea. You should pay for them if manually performing the task they replace is the more costly option.